The K-Landnews would like to sincerely thank London Mayor Boris Johnson for some very open comments about intelligence and the value of envy.
To illustrate why we are thankful to the mayor, these are the relevant quotes according to the Guardian newspaper.
"Whatever you may think of the value of IQ tests it is surely
relevant to a conversation about equality that as many as 16% of our
species have an IQ below 85 while about 2% …"
"......called for more to be done to help the 2% of the population who have an
IQ above 130."
Johnson made the remarks during a speech in honour
of Margaret Thatcher, declaring that inequality was essential to foster
"the spirit of envy" and hailing greed as a "valuable spur to economic
activity".
No liberal weeping and whining can diminish the value of the statements, after all humans are a species, like dogs, and just like dogs, humans get killed in the most brutal fashion every day.
The immense value of these statements lies in the fact that they were made in front of a substantial audience. The true beliefs of modern day men of a certain age and a certain persuasion should be welcomed by the public.
So much of what we read and what we receive in the form of laws is governed by principles like this, yet, we can not call out the bullshit because it is hidden behind the rhetoric of the upstanding men and women who want to do "what is best for the country".
Again, Thank You Mr. Johnson!
We do have one point of criticism, though.
It is kind of serious. We do not feel good about the call for more to be done to help the 2% of the population who have an
IQ above 130.
Calling for help for the 2% is, in our opinion, inherent discrimination of the 1% of most intelligent people. Sure, helping the one percent below our rarefied level is laudable and shows social conscience, but, let's face it, shouldn't the help go to those first who can make the sort of difference the rest can only marvel at?
Pssst, Boris, more help for the 2% means we are not already running the world? Which, if true, would make us less intelligent than we thought, or just more greedy?
No comments:
Post a Comment